People v. Holder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Holder

45 A.D.3d 863, 845 N.Y.S.2d 755

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 27, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 45 A.D.3d 863 (People v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Holder, 45 A.D.3d 863, 845 N.Y.S.2d 755 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

by the defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walker, J.), all rendered September 28, 2006, convicting him of failure to register as a sex offender under superior court information No. 2006-00324, intimidating a victim in the third degree under superior court information No. 2006-00325, resisting arrest under superior court information No. 2006-00326, and grand larceny in the fourth degree under superior court information No. 2006-00327, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Rivera, J.P., Florio, Carni and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

by the defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walker, J.), all rendered September 28, 2006, convicting him of failure to register as a sex offender under superior court information No. 2006-00324, intimidating a victim in the third degree under superior court information No. 2006-00325, resisting arrest under superior court information No. 2006-00326, and grand larceny in the fourth degree under superior court information No. 2006-00327, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Rivera, J.P., Florio, Carni and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.3d 863, 845 N.Y.S.2d 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-holder-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack