People v. Holder

299 A.D.2d 367, 749 N.Y.S.2d 160

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), rendered November 16, 1999, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the People did not engage in pervasive or egregious misconduct during their sum[368]*368mation (see e.g. People v Gomez, 156 AD2d 462; People v Simms, 130 AD2d 525). Moreover, the trial court’s charge to the jury stated the material principles of law applicable to the case and did not remove issues from the jury (see People v Baez, 268 AD2d 201; People v Turton, 221 AD2d 671). Ritter, J.P., Altman, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Holder, 299 A.D.2d 367, 749 N.Y.S.2d 160 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

299 A.D.2d 367 (People v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Simms
130 A.D.2d 525 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Gomez
156 A.D.2d 462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Turton
221 A.D.2d 671 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Baez
268 A.D.2d 201 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)