People v. Hogg
754 N.W.2d 892, 482 Mich. 974
Opinion
PEOPLE Of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dehaven Lapriest HOGG, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 31, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting statement in People v. Conway, 474 Mich. 1140, 716 N.W.2d 554 (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Hogg, 754 N.W.2d 892, 482 Mich. 974 (Mich. 2008).
754 N.W.2d 892 (People v. Hogg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Conway
716 N.W.2d 554 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)