People v. Hogencamp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hogencamp

284 A.D.2d 734, 726 N.Y.S.2d 585, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6631

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D.2d 734 (People v. Hogencamp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hogencamp, 284 A.D.2d 734, 726 N.Y.S.2d 585, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6631 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Delaware County (Estes, J.), rendered April 12, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the third degree.

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief leads us to the same conclusion. Defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty to the charge of grand larceny in the third degree in full satisfaction of the indictment against him and was sentenced to a prison term of 1 to 3 years, in accordance with the plea agreement. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650). Inasmuch as the matters raised in defendant’s pro se submission are dehors the record, we are unable to address them on this appeal.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Delaware County (Estes, J.), rendered April 12, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the third degree.

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief leads us to the same conclusion. Defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty to the charge of grand larceny in the third degree in full satisfaction of the indictment against him and was sentenced to a prison term of 1 to 3 years, in accordance with the plea agreement. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650). Inasmuch as the matters raised in defendant’s pro se submission are dehors the record, we are unable to address them on this appeal.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D.2d 734, 726 N.Y.S.2d 585, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hogencamp-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack