People v. Hogan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hogan

15 A.D.3d 944, 788 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 977

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 4, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 A.D.3d 944 (People v. Hogan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hogan, 15 A.D.3d 944, 788 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 977 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Mario J. Rossetti, A.J.), rendered December 17, 2002. The judgment convicted de[945]*945fendant, upon a jury verdict, of attempted robbery in the second degree (two counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of two counts of attempted robbery in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.10 [2] [a], [b]). “Because the evidence at the first trial is legally sufficient, . . . we conclude that the retrial did not violate the prohibition against double jeopardy” (People v Smith, 8 AD3d 965, 966 [2004]; see People v Montgomery, 1 AD3d 984, 985 [2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 631 [2004]). The evidence at the retrial likewise is legally sufficient to support the conviction, and the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Moye, 11 AD3d 1027, 1028 [2004]; see also People v Rouse, 8 AD3d 982 [2004], Iv denied 3 NY3d 681 [2004]; see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). The evidence, the law and the circumstances of this case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, establish that defendant received meaningful representation (see People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; see also People v Robot, 84 NY2d 1021, 1022 [1995]). Present — Scudder, J.P, Kehoe, Gorski, Martoche and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Mario J. Rossetti, A.J.), rendered December 17, 2002. The judgment convicted de[945]*945fendant, upon a jury verdict, of attempted robbery in the second degree (two counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of two counts of attempted robbery in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.10 [2] [a], [b]). “Because the evidence at the first trial is legally sufficient, . . . we conclude that the retrial did not violate the prohibition against double jeopardy” (People v Smith, 8 AD3d 965, 966 [2004]; see People v Montgomery, 1 AD3d 984, 985 [2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 631 [2004]). The evidence at the retrial likewise is legally sufficient to support the conviction, and the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Moye, 11 AD3d 1027, 1028 [2004]; see also People v Rouse, 8 AD3d 982 [2004], Iv denied 3 NY3d 681 [2004]; see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). The evidence, the law and the circumstances of this case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, establish that defendant received meaningful representation (see People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; see also People v Robot, 84 NY2d 1021, 1022 [1995]). Present — Scudder, J.P, Kehoe, Gorski, Martoche and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A.D.3d 944, 788 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hogan-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack