People v. Hofmann

2017 NY Slip Op 1385, 147 A.D.3d 1083, 46 N.Y.S.3d 899
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 22, 2017·No. 2016-00036·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), imposed December 1, 2015, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground, inter alia, that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the sentence he received pursuant to the plea agreement constituted cruel and unusual punishment is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gil, 109 AD3d 484, 485 [2013]) and, in any event, without merit (see People v Jones, 39 NY2d 694, 697 [1976]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 85-86 [1982]).

Chambers, J.P., Hall, Maltese and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hofmann, 2017 NY Slip Op 1385, 147 A.D.3d 1083, 46 N.Y.S.3d 899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 1385 (People v. Hofmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Jones
350 N.E.2d 913 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Gil
109 A.D.3d 484 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)