People v. Hoffman

2021 NY Slip Op 00689, 191 A.D.3d 1262, 137 N.Y.S.3d 784
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 5, 2021
Docket140 KA 18-01133
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 00689 (People v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hoffman, 2021 NY Slip Op 00689, 191 A.D.3d 1262, 137 N.Y.S.3d 784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People v Hoffman (2021 NY Slip Op 00689)
People v Hoffman
2021 NY Slip Op 00689
Decided on February 5, 2021
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 5, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

140 KA 18-01133

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

PAUL R. HOFFMAN, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (JANE I. YOON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (ROBERT J. SHOEMAKER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Charles N. Zambito, J.), rendered January 26, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and therefore does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v Love, 181 AD3d 1193, 1193 [4th Dept 2020]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: February 5, 2021

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Rios
2024 NY Slip Op 00549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Kakesa
2023 NY Slip Op 06668 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Lovines
174 N.Y.S.3d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Torrance
2022 NY Slip Op 04266 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Terry
203 A.D.3d 1578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Raymond
2021 NY Slip Op 07433 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Smith
2021 NY Slip Op 04464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Ball
2021 NY Slip Op 04462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 00689, 191 A.D.3d 1262, 137 N.Y.S.3d 784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hoffman-nyappdiv-2021.