People v. Hoffman

159 A.D.2d 638
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 19, 1990·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.), rendered March 20, 1987, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and possession of burglars’ tools, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the provision thereof which requires the defendant to make restitution in the amount of $1,082.44; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for a new determination of the amount of restitution required under Penal Law § 60.27.

[639] We find, as the People concede, that the County Court improperly delegated to the Nassau County Probation Department the authority to determine the amount and manner of restitution (see, People v Fuller, 57 NY2d 152; People v Bray, 150 AD2d 788; People v Bentivegna, 145 AD2d 899). The court failed to make any independent judicial finding as to the actual losses sustained by the victims, nor did it consider whether the defendant could afford to make restitution (see, People v Millar, 144 AD2d 1032; People v Bowden, 131 AD2d 581; People v Write, 119 AD2d 708). Brown, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hoffman, 159 A.D.2d 638 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

159 A.D.2d 638 (People v. Hoffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Giovannotto
185 A.D.2d 361 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Byrd
175 A.D.2d 170 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)