People v. Hoenig

New York Supreme Court

People v. Hoenig

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 93

DecidedFebruary 15, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 93 (People v. Hoenig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hoenig, 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 93 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Bischoff, J.:

The fact that there has been one conviction or an agent or servant of the certificate holder heretofore involves the loss by the latter of his privileges under the certificate, should this prosecution result in a conviction. (Liquor Tax Law, § 3i? subd. 3.) Therefore the reasons which justify an application for a direction that the charge be prosecuted by indictment, in the case of the certificate holder, personally, apply to such a case as this.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bischoff, J.:

The fact that there has been one conviction or an agent or servant of the certificate holder heretofore involves the loss by the latter of his privileges under the certificate, should this prosecution result in a conviction. (Liquor Tax Law, § 3i? subd. 3.) Therefore the reasons which justify an application for a direction that the charge be prosecuted by indictment, in the case of the certificate holder, personally, apply to such a case as this.

Motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hoenig-nysupct-1903.