Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Hodges

People v. Hodges

57 A.D.3d 920, 869 N.Y.2d 343
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hodges. Read the opinion of the Court — 66 A.D.3d 1228 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 2008·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was valid (see People v Holman, 89 NY2d 876, 878 [1996]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11 [1989]), and precludes review of his challenge to the factual sufficiency of his plea allocution (see People v Murphy, 55 AD3d 930 [2008]; People v McCarthy, 53 AD3d 589 [2008]; People v Wager, 34 AD3d 505, 506 [2006]; People v Curras, 1 [921]*921AD3d 445 [2003]) and his right to claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761, 763 [1993]; People v Coss, 309 AD2d 945 [2003]; People v Acevedo, 216 AD2d 476 [1995]). Mastro, J.E, Miller, Balkin and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hodges, 57 A.D.3d 920, 869 N.Y.2d 343 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

57 A.D.3d 920 (People v. Hodges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Allen
623 N.E.2d 1170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Holman
675 N.E.2d 847 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Wager
34 A.D.3d 505 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. McCarthy
53 A.D.3d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Murphy
55 A.D.3d 930 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Acevedo
216 A.D.2d 476 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Coss
309 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)