People v. Hodge
This text of 125 A.D.3d 443 (People v. Hodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), rendered May 31, 2012, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of bail jumping in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.
*444 The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]). Contrary to defendant’s argument, the People were not required to establish any culpable mental state (see People v Thomas, 287 AD2d 324 [1st Dept 2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 709 [2002]; see also People v Eiffel, 81 NY2d 480, 483 [1993]). Accordingly, the court properly charged the jury on the elements of bail jumping in the second degree without specifying any required mental state, tracking the applicable section of the Criminal Jury Instructions (see Penal Law § 215.56; see also People v Diaz, 105 AD3d 652 [1st Dept 2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 1015 [2013]). Insofar as People v Simpkins (174 AD2d 341 [1st Dept 1991], lv denied 78 NY2d 1015 [1991]) is to the contrary, it should not be followed. Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Feinman, Clark and Kapnick, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 A.D.3d 443, 999 N.Y.S.2d 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hodge-nyappdiv-2015.