People v. Hodge

176 A.D.2d 1234, 578 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13950
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 4, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 176 A.D.2d 1234 (People v. Hodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hodge, 176 A.D.2d 1234, 578 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: From our review of the record, we conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support a finding that the value of the fruits of the offense exceeded $30,000 and therefore the court’s order of restitution in that amount was proper (see, Penal Law § 60.27; see, e.g., People v Reiter, 133 AD2d 901, 902-903, lv denied 71 NY2d 901). Further, we find no merit to defendant’s pro se contention that his sentence was harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J. — Criminal Possession Forged Instrument, 2nd Degree.) Present — Callahan, A. P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

HUTCHINGS, BRIAN K., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
People v. Hutchings
142 A.D.3d 1292 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Nicometo
309 A.D.2d 1172 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Weinberg
213 A.D.2d 506 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 A.D.2d 1234, 578 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hodge-nyappdiv-1991.