People v. Hodge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hodge

176 A.D.2d 1234, 578 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13950

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 4, 1991·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: From our review of the record, we conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support a finding that the value of the fruits of the offense exceeded $30,000 and therefore the court’s order of restitution in that amount was proper (see, Penal Law § 60.27; see, e.g., People v Reiter, 133 AD2d 901, 902-903, lv denied 71 NY2d 901). Further, we find no merit to defendant’s pro se contention that his sentence was harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J. — Criminal Possession Forged Instrument, 2nd Degree.) Present — Callahan, A. P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: From our review of the record, we conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support a finding that the value of the fruits of the offense exceeded $30,000 and therefore the court’s order of restitution in that amount was proper (see, Penal Law § 60.27; see, e.g., People v Reiter, 133 AD2d 901, 902-903, lv denied 71 NY2d 901). Further, we find no merit to defendant’s pro se contention that his sentence was harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J. — Criminal Possession Forged Instrument, 2nd Degree.) Present — Callahan, A. P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

People v. Hodge, 176 A.D.2d 1234, 578 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

176 A.D.2d 1234 (People v. Hodge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related