People v. Hobbs

1 A.D.2d 610, 767 N.Y.S.2d 665

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flaherty, J.), rendered November 7, 2001, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claims regarding the prosecutor’s alleged misconduct during his cross-examination of the defendant and his summation are largely unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Medina, 53 NY2d 951 [1981]; People v Scotti, 220 AD2d 543 [1995]; People v Rosario, 195 AD2d 577 [1993]). In any event, the trial court sustained the defense counsel’s objections to those comments that were improper, and gave curative instructions, which were not objected to. Altman, J.P, Florio, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hobbs, 1 A.D.2d 610, 767 N.Y.S.2d 665 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

1 A.D.2d 610 (People v. Hobbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Medina
424 N.E.2d 276 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Rosario
195 A.D.2d 577 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Scotti
220 A.D.2d 543 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)