People v. Hobart

286 A.D.2d 916, 731 N.Y.S.2d 127, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9000
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 28, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 286 A.D.2d 916 (People v. Hobart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hobart, 286 A.D.2d 916, 731 N.Y.S.2d 127, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9000 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [2]) and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of incarceration of 25 years to life, defendant contends that his plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because Supreme Court refused to assign new counsel at defendant’s request and because the plea was induced by the threat of a heavier sentence if defendant did not plead guilty. Those contentions are unpreserved for our review because defendant failed to move to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction (see, People v Woods, 281 AD2d 929; People v Nixon, 278 AD2d 941, lv denied 96 NY2d 786; People v Harriott, 277 AD2d 987). Indeed, it appears that defendant abandoned his request for a substitution of counsel, deciding instead to plead guilty while still being represented by the same attorney. In any event, we discern no basis on this record for a mandatory substitution of counsel (see generally, People v Sides, 75 NY2d 822, 824-825; People v Medina, 44 NY2d 199, 206-209). The [917]*917court made the requisite “minimal inquiry” into “the nature of the disagreement or its potential for resolution” (People v Sides, supra, at 825), and defendant was unable to articulate any basis for substitution of counsel (see, People v Sides, supra, at 824; People v Brant, 277 AD2d 1022, lv denied 96 NY2d 756; People v Schojan, 272 AD2d 932, 933, lv denied 95 NY2d 871; People v Benson, 265 AD2d 814, 814-815, lv denied 94 NY2d 860, cert denied 529 US 1076).

There is no merit to defendant’s further contention that the plea was involuntary because it was coerced by the explicit threat of a heavier sentence (see, People v Hecht, 257 AD2d 493, lv denied 93 NY2d 853; People v Miles, 256 AD2d 157). The risk of a heavier sentence after trial does not render a plea involuntary (see, People v Dashnaw, 260 AD2d 658, 659, lv denied 93 NY2d 968; People v Polite, 259 AD2d 566, lv denied 93 NY2d 1025; People v Hillendale, 244 AD2d 911, 912; People v Gibson, 167 AD2d 921, lv denied 77 NY2d 961). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Brunetti, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Wisner, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Molina
175 N.Y.S.3d 651 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Love
2020 NY Slip Op 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Jones
2019 NY Slip Op 4543 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
HAMPTON, TERENCE, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Hampton
113 A.D.3d 1131 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
GUANTERO, FERNANDO, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
People v. Guantero
100 A.D.3d 1386 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
MORRIS, ALLEN, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
People v. Morris
94 A.D.3d 1450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
MUNZERT, TIMOTHY C., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
People v. Munzert
92 A.D.3d 1291 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
OCASIO, ORLANDO O., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
People v. Ocasio
81 A.D.3d 1469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Cobb
72 A.D.3d 1565 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Velasquez
47 A.D.3d 422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Hamilton
45 A.D.3d 1396 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Clark
24 A.D.3d 1225 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Lazo
16 A.D.3d 1153 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Cromwell
294 A.D.2d 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
286 A.D.2d 916, 731 N.Y.S.2d 127, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hobart-nyappdiv-2001.