People v. Hmoud

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hmoud

292 A.D.2d 465, 738 N.Y.S.2d 879, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2509

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 292 A.D.2d 465 (People v. Hmoud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hmoud, 292 A.D.2d 465, 738 N.Y.S.2d 879, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2509 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Roman, J.), rendered August 24, 2000, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[466]*466Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, where the defendant waived his right to testify, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s request to reopen the proof in order for him to testify after defense counsel’s summation but before the charge to the jury (see, People v Braxton, 254 AD2d 365, 366; People v Sumpter, 199 AD2d 1042; People v Farrow, 176 AD2d 130, 131). Altman, J.P., Adams, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Roman, J.), rendered August 24, 2000, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[466]*466Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, where the defendant waived his right to testify, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s request to reopen the proof in order for him to testify after defense counsel’s summation but before the charge to the jury (see, People v Braxton, 254 AD2d 365, 366; People v Sumpter, 199 AD2d 1042; People v Farrow, 176 AD2d 130, 131). Altman, J.P., Adams, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 A.D.2d 465, 738 N.Y.S.2d 879, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hmoud-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack