People v. Hixon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hixon

152 A.D.2d 932, 544 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9791

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hixon. Read the opinion of the Court — 130 A.D.2d 508 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 12, 1989·Published

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the suppression court erred in failing to suppress testimony concerning voice identification. There was no reasonable possibility that the challenged voice identification contributed to defendant’s conviction, and thus any error in its admission was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 237). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J. — murder, second degree, and another charge.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the suppression court erred in failing to suppress testimony concerning voice identification. There was no reasonable possibility that the challenged voice identification contributed to defendant’s conviction, and thus any error in its admission was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 237). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J. — murder, second degree, and another charge.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.

People v. Hixon, 152 A.D.2d 932, 544 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

152 A.D.2d 932 (People v. Hixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related