Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Hixon

People v. Hixon

152 A.D.2d 932, 544 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9791
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 12, 1989
StatusPublished

This text of 152 A.D.2d 932 (People v. Hixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hixon, 152 A.D.2d 932, 544 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the suppression court erred in failing to suppress testimony concerning voice identification. There was no reasonable possibility that the challenged voice identification contributed to defendant’s conviction, and thus any error in its admission was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 237). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J. — murder, second degree, and another charge.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Adams
423 N.E.2d 379 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 A.D.2d 932, 544 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hixon-nyappdiv-1989.