People v. Hirsch

241 A.D. 712
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

No evidence was adduced to establish the fact that defendant knowingly left the scene of the accident. To the contrary, the testimony of the defendant’s witnesses proved conclusively that the taxicab driver was not aware of the fact that his taxicab came in contact with complainant’s car. There is no violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law, section 70, subdivision 5-a, unless it is shown beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had knowledge that there was an accident. (People v. Thomas, 232 App. Div. 475; People v. Shlansky, 256 N. Y. 538; People ex rel. Scott v. Goldman, 236 App. Div. 788.) Judgment reversed, the information dismissed and the fine remitted. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hirsch, 241 A.D. 712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

241 A.D. 712 (People v. Hirsch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Slocum
126 Misc. 2d 364 (New York County Courts, 1984)
State v. Martin
440 P.2d 429 (Washington Supreme Court, 1968)
Touchstone v. State
155 So. 2d 349 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1963)