People v. Hirsch

241 A.D. 712
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 241 A.D. 712 (People v. Hirsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hirsch, 241 A.D. 712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

No evidence was adduced to establish the fact that defendant knowingly left the scene of the accident. To the contrary, the testimony of the defendant’s witnesses proved conclusively that the taxicab driver was not aware of the fact that his taxicab came in contact with complainant’s car. There is no violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law, section 70, subdivision 5-a, unless it is shown beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had knowledge that there was an accident. (People v. Thomas, 232 App. Div. 475; People v. Shlansky, 256 N. Y. 538; People ex rel. Scott v. Goldman, 236 App. Div. 788.) Judgment reversed, the information dismissed and the fine remitted. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Slocum
126 Misc. 2d 364 (New York County Courts, 1984)
State v. Martin
440 P.2d 429 (Washington Supreme Court, 1968)
Touchstone v. State
155 So. 2d 349 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.D. 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hirsch-nyappdiv-1934.