People v. Hinton

16 A.D.3d 437, 790 N.Y.S.2d 399, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2349
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hinton. Read the opinion of the Court — 302 A.D.2d 1008

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), rendered June 24, 2003, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (LaCava, J.), upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of violation of Agriculture & Markets Law § 351, prohibition of animal fighting.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). H. Miller, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hinton, 16 A.D.3d 437, 790 N.Y.S.2d 399, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2349 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

16 A.D.3d 437 (People v. Hinton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)