People v. Hinton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hinton

41 A.D.2d 855, 342 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4614

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 30, 1973·Published

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered April 18,1972 nunc pro tuna as of July 17,1970, affirmed. The sentence minutes were apparently available at the time defendant appealed from the judgment of conviction. He could have raised the allocution question at that time. He failed to do so. He may not now do so by way of a coram nobis application {People v. Sullivan, 3 NT Y 2d 196). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Shapiro and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered April 18,1972 nunc pro tuna as of July 17,1970, affirmed. The sentence minutes were apparently available at the time defendant appealed from the judgment of conviction. He could have raised the allocution question at that time. He failed to do so. He may not now do so by way of a coram nobis application {People v. Sullivan, 3 NT Y 2d 196). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Shapiro and Christ, JJ., concur.

People v. Hinton, 41 A.D.2d 855, 342 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4614 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

41 A.D.2d 855 (People v. Hinton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.