People v. Hinson
196 N.W.2d 47, 38 Mich. App. 282
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 21, 1972
DocketDocket No. 11945
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 196 N.W.2d 47 (People v. Hinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Hinson, 196 N.W.2d 47, 38 Mich. App. 282 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).
Opinion
Defendant was tried and convicted of breaking and entering an occupied dwelling and appeals. A motion to affirm has been filed by the people.
Upon examination of the briefs and record, it is manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.
Motion to affirm granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Patterson
196 N.W.2d 47 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1972)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
196 N.W.2d 47, 38 Mich. App. 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hinson-michctapp-1972.