People v. Hinestrosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hinestrosa

121 A.D.2d 469, 503 N.Y.S.2d 155, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58434

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 121 A.D.2d 469 (People v. Hinestrosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hinestrosa, 121 A.D.2d 469, 503 N.Y.S.2d 155, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58434 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Plumadore, J.), rendered July 7, 1981, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

By his plea of guilty, the defendant forfeited his right to challenge the geographical jurisdiction of Nassau County to prosecute the instant indictment (see, e.g., People v Amato, 101 AD2d 890). In any event, it appears from the record that Nassau County’s assertion of jurisdiction was proper (see, CPL 20.40 [1] [a]).

We have considered the defendant’s other contentions and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit. Mengano, J. P., Gibbons, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Plumadore, J.), rendered July 7, 1981, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

By his plea of guilty, the defendant forfeited his right to challenge the geographical jurisdiction of Nassau County to prosecute the instant indictment (see, e.g., People v Amato, 101 AD2d 890). In any event, it appears from the record that Nassau County’s assertion of jurisdiction was proper (see, CPL 20.40 [1] [a]).

We have considered the defendant’s other contentions and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit. Mengano, J. P., Gibbons, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 A.D.2d 469, 503 N.Y.S.2d 155, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hinestrosa-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack