People v. Hines

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hines

2017 NY Slip Op 4785, 151 A.D.3d 522, 53 N.Y.S.3d 830

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hines. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 A.D.3d 1385 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 2017·No. 1404/13 4239 4873/12 4238·Published

Opinion

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered December 19, 2003, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Concur— Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Richter, Feinman and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered December 19, 2003, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Concur— Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Richter, Feinman and Webber, JJ.

People v. Hines, 2017 NY Slip Op 4785, 151 A.D.3d 522, 53 N.Y.S.3d 830 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

2017 NY Slip Op 4785 (People v. Hines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.