People v. Hines

82 A.D.3d 1694, 919 N.Y.2d 439
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 25, 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]). Contrary to the contention of defendant, the record establishes that he was sentenced in accordance with the terms of the plea bargain (see People v Green, 277 AD2d 970 [2000], lv denied 96 NY2d 759 [2001]). By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his further contention with respect to the People’s alleged violation of CPL 160.50 (see generally People v Nunez, 73 AD3d 1469 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 808 [2010]). Present — Scudder, EJ., Smith, Feradotto, Lindley and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hines, 82 A.D.3d 1694, 919 N.Y.2d 439 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

82 A.D.3d 1694 (People v. Hines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Nack
2021 NY Slip Op 06882 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)