People v. Hinds

261 A.D.2d 415, 690 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4460

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Minardo, J.), rendered March 25, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the People did not violate the requirements set forth under Brady v Maryland (373 US 83). Even if, as the defendant contends, a follow-up police report was exculpatory material, the People turned over the report to the defense prior to jury selection (see, People v White, 178 AD2d 674).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Santucci, J. P., Krausman, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hinds, 261 A.D.2d 415, 690 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4460 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

261 A.D.2d 415 (People v. Hinds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1963)
People v. White
178 A.D.2d 674 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)