People v. Hilton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hilton

134 A.D.2d 282, 520 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50465

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 2, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 134 A.D.2d 282 (People v. Hilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hilton, 134 A.D.2d 282, 520 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50465 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Potoker, J.), [283]*283rendered October 7, 1983, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) by permission, an order of the same court (Miller, J.), entered November 10, 1986, which denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment.

Ordered that the judgment and order are affirmed.

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the evidence disproved, beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant’s defense of justification. We further find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining challenges to his conviction, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be without merit or unpreserved for appellate review. Finally, the defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10 was properly denied. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Lawrence and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Potoker, J.), [283]*283rendered October 7, 1983, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) by permission, an order of the same court (Miller, J.), entered November 10, 1986, which denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment.

Ordered that the judgment and order are affirmed.

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the evidence disproved, beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant’s defense of justification. We further find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining challenges to his conviction, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be without merit or unpreserved for appellate review. Finally, the defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10 was properly denied. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Lawrence and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 A.D.2d 282, 520 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hilton-nyappdiv-1987.