People v. Hillmon
154 A.D.2d 887, 546 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12822
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 6, 1989·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to make a motion pursuant to CPL 330.30, defendant has failed to preserve for review his argument that the court’s verdict, following a bench trial, is repugnant (People v Alfaro, 66 NY2d 985, 987; People v Baldwin, 130 AD2d 666, 667-668). We decline to reach this issue in the interest of justice. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J. — burglary, third degree; criminal mischief, fourth degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Hillmon, 154 A.D.2d 887, 546 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).
154 A.D.2d 887 (People v. Hillmon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Putt
303 A.D.2d 992 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Cesario
157 A.D.2d 795 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)