Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Hillmon

People v. Hillmon

154 A.D.2d 887, 546 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12822
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 6, 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 154 A.D.2d 887 (People v. Hillmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hillmon, 154 A.D.2d 887, 546 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to make a motion pursuant to CPL 330.30, defendant has failed to preserve for review his argument that the court’s verdict, following a bench trial, is repugnant (People v Alfaro, 66 NY2d 985, 987; People v Baldwin, 130 AD2d 666, 667-668). We decline to reach this issue in the interest of justice. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J. — burglary, third degree; criminal mischief, fourth degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Putt
303 A.D.2d 992 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Cesario
157 A.D.2d 795 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 A.D.2d 887, 546 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hillmon-nyappdiv-1989.