Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Hill

People v. Hill

141 A.D.3d 675, 34 N.Y.S.3d 904
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hill. Read the opinion of the Court — 128 A.D.3d 1479 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 20, 2016·No. 2015-03926·Published

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Rings County (Sciarrino, Jr., J.), imposed April 27, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 140 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Mastro, Hall, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hill, 141 A.D.3d 675, 34 N.Y.S.3d 904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

141 A.D.3d 675 (People v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)