People v. Hill
90 A.D.3d 457, 935 N.Y.2d 266
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hill. Read the opinion of the Court — 74 A.D.3d 1782 →
Opinion
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Counsel for appellant is referred to Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR) § 606.5. Concur — Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Hill, 90 A.D.3d 457, 935 N.Y.2d 266 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
90 A.D.3d 457 (People v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.