People v. Hill

171 A.D.2d 1065, 569 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6809
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 8, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court properly accepted defendant’s plea to first degree manslaughter. The court’s inquiry was sufficient and provided a factual basis for the plea (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 667-668). Defendant admitted that he knew his cousin, a codefendant, intended to kill the victim, that he provided him with the shotgun and that he was present when the shooting occurred. These facts establish that defendant [1066]*1066shared a community of purpose with his cousin (see, People v Allah, 71 NY2d 830, 832; People v Whatley, 69 NY2d 784, 785; People v Herring, 149 AD2d 731, 734-735, Iv denied 74 NY2d 741). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — Manslaughter, 1st Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hill, 171 A.D.2d 1065, 569 N.Y.S.2d 42, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

171 A.D.2d 1065 (People v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. West
599 F. Supp. 2d 371 (W.D. New York, 2009)