People v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hill

47 A.D.2d 880, 366 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9282

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 17, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 880 (People v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hill, 47 A.D.2d 880, 366 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9282 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on May 17, 1973, convicting defendant of the crimes of robbery, first and second degrees, grand larceny in the third degree, and possession of a dangerous weapon; and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate sentences of imprisonment not to exceed seven, seven and four years, respectively, and unconditional discharge, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the grand larceny count, and otherwise affirmed. The dismissed count is a lesser [881]*881included count in the indictment, and conviction of the greater count requires dismissal of the lesser count (see People v Pyles, 44 AD2d 784; CPL 300.40, subd 3, par [b]). Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on May 17, 1973, convicting defendant of the crimes of robbery, first and second degrees, grand larceny in the third degree, and possession of a dangerous weapon; and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate sentences of imprisonment not to exceed seven, seven and four years, respectively, and unconditional discharge, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the grand larceny count, and otherwise affirmed. The dismissed count is a lesser [881]*881included count in the indictment, and conviction of the greater count requires dismissal of the lesser count (see People v Pyles, 44 AD2d 784; CPL 300.40, subd 3, par [b]). Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 880, 366 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hill-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack