People v. Hill
34 Mich. App. 706
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hill. Read the opinion of the Court — 44 Mich. App. 308 →
Opinions
The people have filed a motion to affirm. A review of the briefs and record in this cause make it manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so insubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Hill, 34 Mich. App. 706 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).
34 Mich. App. 706 (People v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Martin
185 N.W.2d 430 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1970)