People v. Higbee

70 Cal. App. 788
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 16, 1924
DocketCrim. No. 1201
StatusPublished

This text of 70 Cal. App. 788 (People v. Higbee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Higbee, 70 Cal. App. 788 (Cal. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

ST. SURE, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction had upon an information wherein he is charged with the commission of the crime of burglary. This case may be characterized as a companion case to People v. Clinton et al., ante, p. 262 [233 Pac. 78]. The language contained in the charging part of the information is identical and the facts adduced at the trial are substantially the same. The same points are urged for reversal here as were urged there. Upon the authority of People v. Clinton et al., the judgment is reversed and cause remanded for a new trial,

Knight, J., and Tyler, P. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Clinton
233 P. 78 (California Court of Appeal, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 Cal. App. 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-higbee-calctapp-1924.