People v. Higbee

233 P. 79, 70 Cal. App. 788, 1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 164
California Court of Appeal·Decided December 16, 1924·No. Docket No. 1201.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction had upon an information wherein he is charged with the commission of the crime of burglary. This case may be characterized as a companion case to People v. Clinton et al., ante, p. 262 [233 P. 78]. The language contained in the charging part of the information is identical and the facts adduced at the trial are substantially the same. The same points are urged for reversal here as were urged there. [1] Upon the authority of People v. Clinton etal., the judgment is reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.

Knight, J., and Tyler, P.J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Higbee, 233 P. 79, 70 Cal. App. 788, 1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 164 (Cal. Ct. App. 1924).

233 P. 79 (People v. Higbee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Medina Walke
90 P.R. 633 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1964)
People v. Valdez
203 Cal. App. 2d 559 (California Court of Appeal, 1962)
People v. Higbee
248 P. 927 (California Court of Appeal, 1926)