Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Hidalgo

People v. Hidalgo

131 A.D.3d 483, 13 N.Y.S.3d 907
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 5, 2015
Docket2013-08278
StatusPublished

This text of 131 A.D.3d 483 (People v. Hidalgo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hidalgo, 131 A.D.3d 483, 13 N.Y.S.3d 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), imposed August 5, 2013, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of her right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of her excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Mastro, Sgroi, Miller and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 A.D.3d 483, 13 N.Y.S.3d 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hidalgo-nyappdiv-2015.