People v. Hidalgo

213 A.D.2d 493, 624 N.Y.S.2d 897
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 13, 1995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered December 15, 1993, convicting her of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the court erred in accepting her plea of guilty because it was not knowingly and voluntarily entered and because she did not know the weight of the drugs she possessed. These arguments are unpreserved for appellate review because the defendant failed to move to withdraw her plea before sentencing and failed to moved to vacate the judgment of conviction (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665-666; People v Claudio, 64 NY2d 858, 859; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, the record indicates that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered her plea (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; People v Khan, 201 AD2d 586) and that she knew the weight of the drugs she possessed (see, People v Ryan, 82 NY2d 497; People v Garnett, 211 AD2d 813). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hidalgo, 213 A.D.2d 493, 624 N.Y.S.2d 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

213 A.D.2d 493 (People v. Hidalgo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Madden
231 A.D.2d 925 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Doyle
222 A.D.2d 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)