People v. Hicks

California Supreme Court

People v. Hicks

367 P.3d 6, 200 Cal. Rptr. 3d 7

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 23, 2016

DocketNo. S232218.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 367 P.3d 6 (People v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hicks, 367 P.3d 6, 200 Cal. Rptr. 3d 7 (Cal. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition for review is granted. The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to whether the trial court erred when it refused to inform the jury at the retrial of a murder charge that defendant had been convicted of gross vehicular manslaughter in the first trial. (Compare People v. Batchelor (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 1102, 178 Cal.Rptr.3d 28.) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.516(a)(1).)

KRUGER, J., was absent and did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition for review is granted. The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to whether the trial court erred when it refused to inform the jury at the retrial of a murder charge that defendant had been convicted of gross vehicular manslaughter in the first trial. (Compare People v. Batchelor (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 1102, 178 Cal.Rptr.3d 28.) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.516(a)(1).)

KRUGER, J., was absent and did not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

367 P.3d 6, 200 Cal. Rptr. 3d 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hicks-cal-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack