People v. Hibrahim

270 A.D.2d 499, 706 N.Y.S.2d 342, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3243

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), rendered April 30, 1997, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the fingerprint which linked him to the burglary established his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and excluded every hypothesis of innocence (see, People v Sparacino, 150 AD2d 814).

The defendant’s contention that the jury charge constituted reversible error is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v DeJesus, 245 AD2d 298), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Santucci, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hibrahim, 270 A.D.2d 499, 706 N.Y.S.2d 342, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 499 (People v. Hibrahim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Sparacino
150 A.D.2d 814 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Dejesus
245 A.D.2d 298 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)