People v. Hibrahim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hibrahim

270 A.D.2d 499, 706 N.Y.S.2d 342, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3243

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 27, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 270 A.D.2d 499 (People v. Hibrahim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hibrahim, 270 A.D.2d 499, 706 N.Y.S.2d 342, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), rendered April 30, 1997, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the fingerprint which linked him to the burglary established his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and excluded every hypothesis of innocence (see, People v Sparacino, 150 AD2d 814).

The defendant’s contention that the jury charge constituted reversible error is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v DeJesus, 245 AD2d 298), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Santucci, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI