People v. Heyliger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Heyliger

138 A.D.2d 519, 526 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2809

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 14, 1988

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 138 A.D.2d 519 (People v. Heyliger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Heyliger, 138 A.D.2d 519, 526 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Monseratte, J.), rendered November 29, 1984, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant entered his guilty plea voluntarily and with full knowledge of all of his rights (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). The fact that the plea was entered before a Huntley hearing was held does not indicate that the defendant’s counsel was ineffective (see, People v Morris, 100 AD2d 630, affd 64 NY2d 803). Since the sentence imposed was the minimum sentence that may be legally imposed for the crime of murder in the second degree, we will not disturb it (see, People v Pearson, 118 AD2d 737, lv denied 67 NY2d 1055). Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Eiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Monseratte, J.), rendered November 29, 1984, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant entered his guilty plea voluntarily and with full knowledge of all of his rights (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). The fact that the plea was entered before a Huntley hearing was held does not indicate that the defendant’s counsel was ineffective (see, People v Morris, 100 AD2d 630, affd 64 NY2d 803). Since the sentence imposed was the minimum sentence that may be legally imposed for the crime of murder in the second degree, we will not disturb it (see, People v Pearson, 118 AD2d 737, lv denied 67 NY2d 1055). Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Eiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 A.D.2d 519, 526 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-heyliger-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack