People v. Hewlett

522 N.E.2d 1033, 71 N.Y.2d 841, 527 N.Y.S.2d 735, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 195
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 22, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 522 N.E.2d 1033 (People v. Hewlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hewlett, 522 N.E.2d 1033, 71 N.Y.2d 841, 527 N.Y.S.2d 735, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 195 (N.Y. 1988).

Opinion

*842 OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel is conclusory and without support in the record. Defendant fails to identify any theory of defense that was ignored or any particular witness that should have been called (see, People v Benn, 68 NY2d 941, 942). The record demonstrates that defense counsel vigorously cross-examined the People’s witnesses and delivered opening and closing statements that were entirely consistent with defendant’s alibi defense (see, People v Hood, 62 NY2d 863, 865). Thus, there is no support for defendant’s claim that he did not receive "meaningful representation” at trial (see, People v Jones, 55 NY2d 771, 773; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147). Defendant’s remaining contentions are either without merit or unpreserved.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Evans
2018 NY Slip Op 167 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Loret
56 A.D.2d 1283 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. John
2004 NY Slip Op 50792(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2004)
In re Damen M.
309 A.D.2d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Hinds
183 A.D.2d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Leslie
154 Misc. 2d 325 (New York Supreme Court, 1992)
People v. Blackman
173 A.D.2d 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Russell
161 A.D.2d 815 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Douglas
160 A.D.2d 1015 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Salcedo
155 A.D.2d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Jagmohan
151 A.D.2d 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Velez
149 A.D.2d 447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Gatto
146 A.D.2d 643 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Forgione
145 A.D.2d 567 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Felder
143 A.D.2d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Batten
141 A.D.2d 746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
522 N.E.2d 1033, 71 N.Y.2d 841, 527 N.Y.S.2d 735, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hewlett-ny-1988.