People v. Heusinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Heusinger

3 A.D.2d 814, 160 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6097

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 20, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.2d 814 (People v. Heusinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Heusinger, 3 A.D.2d 814, 160 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6097 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed and matter remitted to the Genesee County Court for a hearing. Memorandum: Petitioner alleges, among other things, that he was not advised of his right to counsel nor did he ask that counsel be assigned to him. He charges that counsel was in some manner and without his knowledge or consent assigned before he was produced in court and while he was confined in jail awaiting arraignment and that he was given no opportunity to procure counsel of his own choice. He charges further that section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was not complied with at the time of sentence. The court records in evidence do not conclusively refute the averments of the petitioner. In that situation he was entitled to a hearing. (See People v. Pichetti, 302 N. Y. 290.) All concur. (Appeal from an order of Genesee County Court denying defendant’s motion for a hearing and for an order setting aside a judgment convicting him of burglary, third degree.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Williams and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed and matter remitted to the Genesee County Court for a hearing. Memorandum: Petitioner alleges, among other things, that he was not advised of his right to counsel nor did he ask that counsel be assigned to him. He charges that counsel was in some manner and without his knowledge or consent assigned before he was produced in court and while he was confined in jail awaiting arraignment and that he was given no opportunity to procure counsel of his own choice. He charges further that section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was not complied with at the time of sentence. The court records in evidence do not conclusively refute the averments of the petitioner. In that situation he was entitled to a hearing. (See People v. Pichetti, 302 N. Y. 290.) All concur. (Appeal from an order of Genesee County Court denying defendant’s motion for a hearing and for an order setting aside a judgment convicting him of burglary, third degree.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Williams and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 814, 160 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-heusinger-nyappdiv-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack