People v. Hetherington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hetherington

250 A.D.2d 705, 671 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5506

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D.2d 705 (People v. Hetherington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hetherington, 250 A.D.2d 705, 671 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5506 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Kowtna, J.), rendered March 31, 1997, convicting him of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree (two counts), aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the second degree, and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Kowtna, J.), rendered March 31, 1997, convicting him of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree (two counts), aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the second degree, and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D.2d 705, 671 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hetherington-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack