People v. Herrera

211 A.D.2d 530, 622 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 418
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Herrera. Read the opinion of the Court — 191 A.D.2d 585

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Cerbone, J.), rendered September 10, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to 6 to 12 years, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted for a new trial.

Defendant’s claim that closure of the courtroom deprived him of his right to a public trial was preserved for review in view of the trial court’s grant of the prosecutor’s application prior to affording defense counsel the opportunity to interpose his general objection (People v Gross, 179 AD2d 138, 140-141, lv denied 80 NY2d 832).

As the People concede, the bare assertion of the prosecutor that the witness was still an undercover officer was insufficient to support the closure (People v Martinez, 82 NY2d 436; People v Cuevas, 50 NY2d 1022). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Asch, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Herrera, 211 A.D.2d 530, 622 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 418 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

211 A.D.2d 530 (People v. Herrera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Martinez
624 N.E.2d 1027 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Cuevas
409 N.E.2d 1360 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Gross
179 A.D.2d 138 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)