People v. Herrar
This text of 120 A.D.2d 614 (People v. Herrar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeal by the. defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hayes, J.), rendered April 15, 1983, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Judgment affirmed.
The police had a reasonable basis for stopping the defendant’s motorcycle since they had just observed him committing two traffic violations (see, People v Gooden, 111 AD2d 871). Upon approaching the defendant, two police officers observed him reaching toward his bulging jacket pocket. The officers were thus presented with a reasonable suspicion of danger so as to warrant the minimal intrusion of a frisk of the defendant (see, People v Benjamin, 51 NY2d 267). The subsequent seizure of the defendant’s gun was, therefore, proper.
Additionally, the defendant had previously been sentenced, on separate occasions, for two predicate violent felonies (see, Penal Law § 70.02). Therefore, even though he had never been [615]*615sentenced as a second violent felony offender (see, Penal Law § 70.04), he was properly sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender (see, Penal Law § 70.08; People v Morse, 62 NY2d 205). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 A.D.2d 614, 502 N.Y.S.2d 85, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-herrar-nyappdiv-1986.