People v. Hernandez

251 A.D.2d 347, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6214
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hernandez. Read the opinion of the Court — 218 A.D.2d 167

Opinion

—Appeal by the [348]*348defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rivera, J.), rendered July 30, 1996, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant’s claim that the People used their peremptory challenges to strike several black women in violation of Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79). The trial court properly determined that the defendant failed to sustain his ultimate burden of persuasion that the race-neutral reasons proffered by the People were pretextual (see, People v Payne, 88 NY2d 172; People v Allen, 86 NY2d 101).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hernandez, 251 A.D.2d 347, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6214 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

251 A.D.2d 347 (People v. Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 1986)
People v. Payne
666 N.E.2d 542 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
People v. Allen
653 N.E.2d 1173 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)