People v. Hernandez

246 A.D.2d 393, 666 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 251
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hernandez. Read the opinion of the Court — 218 A.D.2d 167

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered February 29, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, and imposing a mandatory surcharge, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim regarding the surcharge is premature (People v Velasquez, 198 AD2d 25, lv denied 82 NY2d 932). We have reviewed defendant’s arguments concerning the imposition of the surcharge and find them to be without merit. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hernandez, 246 A.D.2d 393, 666 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 251 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

246 A.D.2d 393 (People v. Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Velasquez
198 A.D.2d 25 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)