People v. Hernandez

150 A.D.2d 389, 543 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5647
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hernandez. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 A.D.2d 856

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Ingrassia, J.), rendered August 4, 1988, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

[390]*390Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed. Under the circumstances, he has no basis now to complain that his sentence was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). In any event, the sentence imposed was neither unduly harsh nor excessive and was a proper exercise of the court’s discretion (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hernandez, 150 A.D.2d 389, 543 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5647 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

150 A.D.2d 389 (People v. Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)