People v. Hernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hernandez

10 A.D.2d 576, 200 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12007

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 576 (People v. Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hernandez, 10 A.D.2d 576, 200 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion requesting leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the District Attorney of Bronx County and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellant’s points, together with the original record, with this court on or before March 1, 1960, with notice of argument for the April 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Motion requesting a further enlargement of time within which to perfect the appeal granted insofar as to further extend the defendant’s time to serve and file the record on appeal and appellant’s points to and including March 1, 1960, with notice of argument for the April 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur —Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion requesting leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the District Attorney of Bronx County and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellant’s points, together with the original record, with this court on or before March 1, 1960, with notice of argument for the April 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Motion requesting a further enlargement of time within which to perfect the appeal granted insofar as to further extend the defendant’s time to serve and file the record on appeal and appellant’s points to and including March 1, 1960, with notice of argument for the April 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur —Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 576, 200 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hernandez-nyappdiv-1960.