People v. Hernandez
177 N.E.2d 56, 10 N.Y.2d 774
Opinions
Memorandum : The judgments should be affirmed. We do not hold that the rule stated in People v. Rosario (9 N Y 2d 286) is to be applied prospectively only, but in this case the error of the trial court in refusing the request of counsel for the defense to examine the Grand Jury minutes and pretrial statements of witnesses (which we have examined) was not so prejudicial as to require a reversal (Code Grim. Pro., § 542).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Hernandez, 177 N.E.2d 56, 10 N.Y.2d 774 (N.Y. 1961).
177 N.E.2d 56 (People v. Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Banch
608 N.E.2d 1069 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Jones
517 N.E.2d 865 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Perez
100 A.D.2d 366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Festo
96 A.D.2d 765 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Consolazio
354 N.E.2d 801 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)