People v. Herman
96 A.D.3d 1077, 946 N.Y.S.2d 882
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Herman. Read the opinion of the Court — 78 A.D.3d 1686 →
Opinion
— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), imposed January 18, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, A.P.J., Skelos, Leventhal, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Herman, 96 A.D.3d 1077, 946 N.Y.S.2d 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
96 A.D.3d 1077 (People v. Herman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)