People v. Herman

192 A.D.2d 1110, 598 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4131
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Herman. Read the opinion of the Court — 187 A.D.2d 1027

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court erred in admitting the receipt for the rifle into evidence absent the People’s establishment of an adequate foundation (see, CPLR 4518; People v Gower, 42 NY2d 117, 121). In light of the other evidence establishing ownership of the rifle (see, People v Pena, 50 NY2d 400, 409, rearg denied 51 NY2d 770, cert denied 449 US 1087) and the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, the error was harmless (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 242). Defendant’s sentence is neither harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Rogowski, J.— [1111]*1111Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Herman, 192 A.D.2d 1110, 598 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

192 A.D.2d 1110 (People v. Herman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Gower
366 N.E.2d 69 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
People v. Pena
406 N.E.2d 1347 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)