People v. Herington

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Herington

226 N.E.2d 184, 19 N.Y.2d 758, 279 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1634

DecidedApril 6, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 226 N.E.2d 184 (People v. Herington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Herington, 226 N.E.2d 184, 19 N.Y.2d 758, 279 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1634 (N.Y. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed. On the appeal herein defendant argued that the refusal of his request to examine the probation report constituted a deprivation of his right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This court held that defendant’s rights were not so infringed.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed. On the appeal herein defendant argued that the refusal of his request to examine the probation report constituted a deprivation of his right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This court held that defendant’s rights were not so infringed.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 N.E.2d 184, 19 N.Y.2d 758, 279 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-herington-ny-1967.